in response to the questions that Mr. Hamon asked on my last post (which you need to read for this one to make sense) i discovered that i did need to share my opinion, for what would be the point in posting that article.
The artist claims her messages it the relaitonship between body and art. umm THAT IS NOT ART! im sorry but in no way is documenting a miscarriage, forced or not, art. A miscarriage is a very emotional thing whether it is forced or not. I think anyone pro- life or pro-choice is appaled by this. This girl is destroying an emotion, a happening to a womans body. I cant believe our school supported this project and put it on display. She gives art a very negative connotation. she destroyed her body, a sacred vessel, she used a donor's sperm in a very wrong way, and hurt her self and those who heard about or saw the exibit. she has no regard for human rights or human emotion. she took advantage of something very sacred- creating life and then destrying it.. all for what? art? that is sick, disgusting, horrible. She says "I think that I'm creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be." Maybe i have been disillusioned about what art is. So here is the definition from Dictionary.com
Art–noun
1.the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.
2.the class of objects subject to aesthetic criteria; works of art collectively, as paintings, sculptures, or drawings: a museum of art; an art collection.
3.a field, genre, or category of art: Dance is an art.
4.the fine arts collectively, often excluding architecture: art and architecture.
5.any field using the skills or techniques of art: advertising art; industrial art.
6.(in printed matter) illustrative or decorative material: Is there any art with the copy for this story?
7.the principles or methods governing any craft or branch of learning: the art of baking; the art of selling.
8.the craft or trade using these principles or methods.
9.skill in conducting any human activity: a master at the art of conversation.
10.a branch of learning or university study, esp. one of the fine arts or the humanities, as music, philosophy, or literature.
11.arts,
a.(used with a singular verb) the humanities: a college of arts and sciences.
b.(used with a plural verb) liberal arts.
12.skilled workmanship, execution, or agency, as distinguished from nature.
13.trickery; cunning: glib and devious art.
14.studied action; artificiality in behavior.
15.an artifice or artful device: the innumerable arts and wiles of politics.
16.Archaic. science, learning, or scholarship.
The first definition- something that is asthetically pleasing.. WATCHING a girl have a miscarriage is not asthetically pleasing. SEEING the blood from unborn children is not asthetically pleasing.
i could go on, but i feel as though i am repeating myself. you get the idea. this girl is sick, twisted, and needs some help. her project is not art, it is only destroying a very emotional, and private part of a woman's life and experience. And our school supported her.
Monday, April 21, 2008
Thursday, April 17, 2008
two in one day.. i know but serisouly..
this is the most disgusting thing i have ever heard in my entire life:
For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourseMartine PowersStaff ReporterPublished Thursday, April 17, 2008Art major Aliza Shvarts '08 wants to make a statement.Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible" while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts' project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock . saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value.""I hope it inspires some sort of discourse," Shvarts said. "Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it's not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone."The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.Art major Juan Castillo '08 said that although he was intrigued by the creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result."I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn't," Castillo said. "I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself."Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to "provoke inquiry.""I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity," Shvarts said. "I think that I'm creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be."The display of Schvarts' project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts' self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman, Schvarts' senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.Few people outside of Yale's undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts' exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups . Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group . said they were not previously aware of Schvarts' project.Alice Buttrick '10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.Sara Rahman '09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body."[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism," Rahman said. "It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion."CLAY member Jonathan Serrato '09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts' exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project "surprising" and unethical."I feel that she's manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don't support it," Serrato said. "I think it's morally wrong."Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers."It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part," Shvarts said. "This isn't something I've been hiding."The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.
For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourseMartine PowersStaff ReporterPublished Thursday, April 17, 2008Art major Aliza Shvarts '08 wants to make a statement.Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible" while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts' project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock . saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value.""I hope it inspires some sort of discourse," Shvarts said. "Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it's not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone."The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.Art major Juan Castillo '08 said that although he was intrigued by the creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result."I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn't," Castillo said. "I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself."Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to "provoke inquiry.""I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity," Shvarts said. "I think that I'm creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be."The display of Schvarts' project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts' self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman, Schvarts' senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.Few people outside of Yale's undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts' exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups . Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group . said they were not previously aware of Schvarts' project.Alice Buttrick '10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.Sara Rahman '09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body."[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism," Rahman said. "It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion."CLAY member Jonathan Serrato '09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts' exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project "surprising" and unethical."I feel that she's manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don't support it," Serrato said. "I think it's morally wrong."Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers."It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part," Shvarts said. "This isn't something I've been hiding."The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.
two weeks.. WHATT
Wow. I am amazed at how fast this semester when by, or the year for that matter. At some points i thought it would NEVER end. but just two weeks and then it is summer! i am so excited. i am unfortunately leaving GCSU, but dont worry i'll be back! this summer is going to bring a lot of change, good times, and growing up. i am just excited to get some time to relax! these past few weeks (and i am sure the next two will be as well) have been KILLER. It is kind of scary to think that i will be a sophomore in college, and for some reason that makes me feel INDREDIBLY old. i should feel young though i am a mere 19 and i have so much of my life to live. I do not really have a lot to share with you.. my brain is mush- i am running on VERY VERY little sleep. but i did watch a video this morning that was really awesome and i hope you enjoy and learn somethng from it as well. so .. here ya go! :D have a great weeK!
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Love is everywhere
So recently i have been thinking, feeling, seeing, knowing a lot about love. Love for my friends and new sisters. Love for my boyfriend. Love for my God. I have been listening to songs, i have seen some movies, looked at videos online. Love is indeed everywhere you go. My new favorite quote, which is now my facebook status, is "It's your God-forsaken right to be loved love love love." and that is SO TURE. so i have decided to share a video or two and some songs for you to look up, and i hope you do, because you are loved. we are loved. everyone is loved by someone. and it is such a great feeling :D
Song list
* Sean McConnell- Madly In Love With You
*Jason Mraz- I'm Yours.
* The Derek McTavish Band- Song of Ascents
*Pete Townshend- Let My Love Open The Door
*Goo Goo Dolls- Let Love In
*Led Zeppelin- Thank You
so i decided to just give you the link to the site of the people who made this video because they have some others that are really good. i hope you enjoy, feel enlightened, and of course LOVED!http://www.youtube.com/user/jesusmademyshoes
Song list
* Sean McConnell- Madly In Love With You
*Jason Mraz- I'm Yours.
* The Derek McTavish Band- Song of Ascents
*Pete Townshend- Let My Love Open The Door
*Goo Goo Dolls- Let Love In
*Led Zeppelin- Thank You
so i decided to just give you the link to the site of the people who made this video because they have some others that are really good. i hope you enjoy, feel enlightened, and of course LOVED!http://www.youtube.com/user/jesusmademyshoes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
